Book the founder · 30 min
Chapter 01 — The Premise
2.5 MW · MCFC + LFP BESS 19.71 GWh/yr · Phase 1 BOL ~93% grid displacement 0.01 lb/MWh NOx 30% §6417 Direct Pay

The 1984 cogen
has run 250,127 hours.

Your Campus Master Plan Phase 2 anticipates replacement in the next 5–10 years. The December 31, 2033 §48E cliff sets the construction-start deadline. The March 2022 CSU Board of Trustees resolution prohibits new natural-gas assets after 2035. The window to capture the full 30% credit is closing.

Why BCal An orchestrator, not a vendor. Open-book pricing. §6417 Direct Pay expertise. CSU/UC procurement track record. Multi-vendor accountability under one transaction. See the five differentiators ↓
Phase 1 capacity
2.5 MW
2× 1.25 MW MCFC + 1 MW / 4 MWh LFP BESS
Phase 1 annual output (BOL)
19.71 GWh
Displaces ~93% of CY2022 PG&E imports (21.27 GWh)
Net SJSU capital (after Direct Pay)
$31.9M
Gross $45.6M minus $13.7M §6417 Direct Pay rebate
§48E full 30% credit expires in
CSU 2035 NG asset prohibition in
Cogen vintage
Dec 1984 · 41+ yrs
02 — The Window

The 7-year extension narrows the window. It doesn't open it.

You secured operating room for the 1984 cogen. That's a tactical win. But the strategic decision window is set by federal credit timing, not by your air permit. Working backward from the §48E full-credit cliff, every month of delay costs more than the next.

TODAY · 2026
Decide. Negotiate. NDA + LOI.
~12 months of vendor selection, BOT preparation, and bond positioning. Cogen runs unchanged.
BY 2028 · BOT APPROVAL
CSU Trustees resolution
~18 months of board cycle work. Procurement + financing locked. Engineering kickoff.
BY 12/31/2030 · CONSTRUCTION START
Latest start for full 30% §48E
Phase 1 build cycle is 30–36 months. Starting later means COD slips past 2033 and the credit step-down begins.
12/31/2033 · §48E CLIFF
100% credit expires
2034: 75%. 2035: 50%. 2036+: 0%. Every year of delay costs ~$3M+ on Phase 1 ITC alone.
THE TRAP IF YOU WAIT
The cogen extension expires around the same time the §48E credit cliffs. Without proactive procurement, SJSU faces forced replacement in 2033–35 — at 50% credit (2035) or 0% (2036+), under BAAQMD pressure, with no competitive vendor bid time, and against a vendor capacity squeeze (MCFC manufacturers are already prioritizing AI data center contracts at multi-GW scale). The extension you secured is a gift only if you spend it. Reactively, it traps you between cogen expiry and credit cliff.
If Phase 1 starts construction
§48E rate
Direct Pay on $45.6M
Cash to SJSU vs. today
By Dec 31, 2033
30%
$13.7M
baseline
In 2034
22.5%
$10.3M
−$3.4M
In 2035
15.0%
$6.8M
−$6.9M
In 2036+
0%
$0
−$13.7M
03 — Validation

“Replacement of the Central Plant is anticipated to be necessary within the next 10 years and as part of Campus Master Plan implementation (Phase 2). It is anticipated that the future system would replace steam with hot water.”

— SJSU Campus Master Plan Draft EIR · January 2025 · page 96

This is not BCal's roadmap. It's SJSU Planning's own document. Our Phase 1 (COD 2029) + Phase 2 (COD 2031–32) + Phase 3 (construction-start before Dec 31, 2033) aligns precisely with the trajectory your campus has already published — and captures the full 30% §48E credit before the 2034 cliff. The steam-to-hot-water transition is exactly what our HRU + thermal-tie-in design accommodates.

EIR p. 96 · Phase 2 replacement EIR p. 261 · 5–10 year window CSU BoT · March 2022 · 2035 NG ban CARB 2022 · third-party verified
04 — Trajectory

A phased transition aligned to SJSU's own plan.

Three phases. Two decades. One deadline. Each milestone below is a contractual checkpoint, not a marketing slide.

2026 · TODAY

Cogen at 42+ years

Cheng Cycle + HRSG + legacy controls. ~40% electrical efficiency. 27,616 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1, 32.3 t/yr NOx.

Status quo · pre-decision
Q3 2026

Site walk + NDA

2-hour site walk. Mutual NDA execution. CPRA-confirmed utility data hand-off. Tie-in feasibility report within 5 business days.

Step 1 of 4 in qualification
2027 · BOT APPROVAL

Governance + LOI

LOI within 5 business days of site walk. CSU Chancellor's Office §6417 confirmation. SJSU BoT Phase 1 approval.

Funding + governance
2028 · BUILD

EPC + permitting

CEQA addendum, BAAQMD Reg 9-9 BACT, City SJ permits, PG&E Rule 21 interconnection. Cell stack manufacturing lead-time begins.

Capital deployment phase
2029 · PHASE 1 COD

2.5 MW MCFC online

19.71 GWh/yr BOL. Displaces ~93% of PG&E grid imports. Steam tie-in to existing HRSG header. BESS provides PG&E peak-shave + N+1.

First commercial deployment
2031–32 · PHASE 2 COD

+2.5 MW MCFC

Aligns with SJSU Campus Master Plan Phase 2 central plant replacement (per EIR p.96). Steam-to-hot-water conversion supported.

Doubles fuel-cell capacity
12 / 31 / 2033 · §48E CLIFF

Last full-credit start

Per OBBBA July 2025: construction-start by this date locks in 30% §48E ITC + 30% §6417 Direct Pay. 2034 = 75%. 2035 = 50%. 2036 = zero.

Federal deadline · non-negotiable
~2034 · PHASE 3 START

Cogen retired

Existing 1984 cogen decommissioned. Final 27,616 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1 eliminated. 32.3 t/yr NOx eliminated.

Decarbonization complete
1 / 1 / 2035 · CSU NG BAN

CSU BoT mandate active

No new natural-gas assets system-wide. Hot-water conversion + RNG/H2 fuel-flex compatibility on MCFC modules.

Mandate compliance
2040 → 2045

80% / Carbon-neutral

CSU 2040 target (80% below 1990). 2045 system-wide carbon neutrality. RNG/H2 blending pathway already engineered.

Long-horizon alignment
05 — The Pressure

Four pressures converging on one decision window.

Each of these is independently documented in SJSU, CARB, BAAQMD, or CSU records — and each tightens the case for moving inside the §48E window.

End-of-life turbine

1984 vintage Cheng Cycle. 250,000+ operating hours. EIR p.96 explicitly anticipates replacement within 10 years. HGP overhaul + DCS modernization + generator rewind capex looms.

EIR p. 96 · STARS 2024

BAAQMD NOx pressure

Cogen emits 32.3 tons/yr NOx. Reg 9-9 BACT tightening puts existing turbines under SCR retrofit pressure. MCFC at <0.01 lb/MWh eliminates this category entirely.

CARB 2022 · BAAQMD Reg 9-9

CSU climate mandate

27,616 MTCO2e/yr cogen Scope 1 — ~85% of SJSU total. CSU BoT March 2022: 80% by 2040, neutral by 2045. New NG assets prohibited after 2035.

CSU BoT · March 2022

Grid dependence rising

21.27 GWh PG&E imports in CY2022 — significantly larger than commonly cited. Master plan projects growth to 10.55M GSF. B-20 + SB rate exposure compounds yearly.

STARS 2024 · PG&E B-20+SB
06 — The Value

Three returns, three currencies.

Cash to the general fund. Risk off the campus's balance sheet. Strategic optionality on fuel and policy.

Cash returned

Treasury Direct Pay to the general fund.

$13.7M

SJSU is a state instrumentality, eligible for §6417 Direct Pay under Treasury final regulations issued March 2024. 30% of qualified project basis is refunded as cash — not a tax offset, but a check to the General Fund. Stackable with §48E ITC monetization on remaining basis.

Risk transferred

EPC + LTSA absorb the worst-case capex.

Off SJSU's balance sheet

Hot-gas-path overhaul. BAAQMD SCR retrofit. DCS modernization. Generator rewind. All transferred under EPC fixed-price + 20-year LTSA performance guarantees. SJSU is not the integration risk holder — the OEM and EPC are, on contract.

Strategic

Future-proofed against fuel + policy.

27,616 MTCO2e/yr

NOx CEQA-exemption pathway via low-emission designation. RNG-compatible Day 1. H2 fuel-flex on roadmap. 27,616 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1 eliminated by Phase 3. Aligns SJSU's central plant with CSU 2040 + 2045 targets without retrofitting.

07 — Why BCal

An orchestrator, not a vendor.

We don't manufacture cells, build EPCs, or operate plants. We assemble the multi-vendor, multi-credit, multi-regulatory transaction — and stand behind it.

Differentiator

Capital structuring · §6417 expertise

Direct Pay for state instrumentalities is procedurally distinct from corporate ITC monetization. We've structured the eligibility memo + IRS filing pathway with bond counsel review.

Differentiator

CSU / UC procurement track record

Peer 2.8 MW MCFC reference operating at a UC campus microgrid. Peer CSU 800 kW MCFC deployment (2015–16). We know the chancellor's-office sign-off path.

Differentiator

Multi-vendor orchestration

Selected MCFC OEM + selected EPC partner (tier-1, MBE, CA Class A/B) + LTSA + interconnect + permitting under one orchestrated agreement. No finger-pointing across vendors.

Differentiator

20-year LTSA negotiation

LTSA pricing escalation, performance guarantees, stack-replacement schedule, fuel-flex provisions, force-majeure carve-outs — all negotiated with comparables on file.

Differentiator

Compliance-pathway specialization

CEQA addendum (vs full EIR), BAAQMD Reg 9-9 low-emission designation, City SJ ministerial, PG&E Rule 21 transmission interconnect at Markham 115 kV.

What BCal is not

We don't manufacture, build, or operate.

OEM manufactures cells. EPC builds. LTSA operates and maintains. BCal orchestrates the multi-vendor, multi-credit, multi-regulatory transaction. Open-book on every line item — no markup hidden in EPC pricing.

08 — Supply Mix

CY2022 vs. post–Phase 1.

Phase 1 doesn't replace your cogen. It replaces 93% of your grid imports — the most expensive and emissions-intensive part of your supply.

SJSU Campus Electric Supply · CY2022

Source: SJSU STARS 2024-01-19 filing. Total campus electric: ~54.1 GWh across 7.72M GSF. Cogen carries the campus base load; PG&E imports cover peaks + supplement.

Phase 1 logic: Cogen continues to provide steam (boiler tie-in maintained). BCal MCFC + BESS displace 19.71 GWh of PG&E imports — leaving only ~1.5 GWh of grid for true peak supplement.
09 — Capital Stack

$45.6M gross. $31.9M net to SJSU.

Open-book waterfall. Every line item is traceable to a vendor proposal, regulatory filing, or budgetary estimate. Direct Pay rebate flows to the general fund within 12–18 months of COD.

MCFC equipment · 2× 1.25 MW modules
$11.97M
EPC + civil + MV interconnect + steam tie-in
$9.63M
Permitting · CEQA · BAAQMD · City SJ · Rule 21
$5.50M
HRSG tie-in + water-side of HRU
$1.65M
Owner soft costs · commissioning · owner's rep
$3.13M
Legal & professional · §6417 + EPC + LTSA + bond
$1.00M
Contingency · 15%
$4.93M
Subtotal (pre-BCal fee)
$37.81M
BCal developer fee · 10% of total installed (open-book)
≤$5.00M
MCFC Phase 1 installed
$42.81M
BESS · 1 MW / 4 MWh LFP
$2.75M
Total Phase 1 installed (gross)
$45.60M
▼ §6417 Direct Pay rebate · 30%
−$13.70M
NET SJSU capital outlay
$31.90M
10 — Year-1 Economics

Approximately at parity in Year 1. Wins after.

At a 3% cogen cost escalation (the CPUC standard assumption), BCal crosses cogen on a per-kWh basis between Year 5 and Year 6. Drag the slider to test sensitivity.

Year-1 BCal cost stack

Debt service · 20-yr · 4.75% on $31.9M$2,508k
MCFC LTSA · vendor-quoted · 2.5%/yr esc.$1,100k
BoP O&M$143k
Fuel · NG @ $1.16/therm · 149,000 MMBtu$1,720k
Y1 BCal total$5,471k
Cogen-equivalent · 19.71 GWh × $0.25/kWh−$4,928k
Y1 delta vs cogen−$543k

+ C3 · SB reservation reduction+$42k
+ C4 · BESS TOU arbitrage+$72k
+ C9 · RECs retained+$177k
Y1 net cash position vs status quo≈ −$252k

≈ $0.013/kWh above cogen Y1 — within forecast noise. LCOE crossover Year 5–6. Real value: Direct Pay cash, Scope 1 elimination, vintage-asset risk transfer.

20-year LCOE · cogen vs BCal

3.0%/yr
5.0%/yr
At 3.0%/yr cogen escalation, BCal crosses cogen by Year 5. CPUC standard assumption. At 5% (recent CA history), crossover moves to Year 3.
11 — Horizon

20 years out: cost-competitive + carbon-eliminated.

Status quo isn't free. Continuing cogen plus the forced 2034–35 replacement (at degraded §48E percentages) is comparable to BCal — without the Scope 1 elimination or NOx wins.

Status quoCogen + forced 2034-35 replacement at 50% §48E
$132M energy
$2.85M SB
$30–40M capital
~$165–175M
+ Scope 1 liability
BCal Phase 1Proactive · within §48E window · Scope 1 eliminated
$127M energy
$1.72M SB
$31.9M capital
~$160M
+ Phase 2/3 incremental
Energy cost (20 yr)
PG&E SB reservation
Capital outlay (net of credits)
Scope 1 GHG liability · unmonetized but mandatory under CSU policy

The honest framing: BCal Phase 1 is cost-competitive with status quo + the forced 2034 replacement. The differentiator is not headline cost — it's 27,616 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1 elimination + 32.3 t/yr NOx + $13.7M Direct Pay cash + vintage-asset risk off the balance sheet. Status quo locks SJSU into a 2035 NG-prohibition violation. BCal does not.

12 — Carbon & Air

From 27,616 to zero.

By Phase 3 construction-start (before Dec 31, 2033), SJSU's central plant Scope 1 emissions are eliminated entirely. Reading down the page tracks the actual decarbonization curve.

Central plant Scope 1 emissions today
27,616
MTCO2e/yr · CARB 2022 · verified by Locus Technologies
CY 2022 · today
27,616
MTCO2e/yr · cogen at 100%
~2029 · Phase 1
~19,000
−31% · MCFC displaces grid
~2032 · Phase 2
~12,000
−56% · cogen ramped down
~2034 · Phase 3
0
cogen retired · 100% eliminated
Watch the replacement

The cogen retreats. The fuel cell advances.

Existing · 1984 cogen

Gas turbine + HRSG

100%
Stationary combustion · 27,616 MTCO2e/yr · 32.3 t/yr NOx · 250,000+ operating hours · BAAQMD Reg 9-9 BACT trigger pending.
BCal · MCFC + BESS

Selected MCFC platform

0%
Carbonate electrochemical conversion · <0.01 lb/MWh NOx · RNG & H2 compatible · 30-yr design life · §6417 Direct Pay-eligible asset.
CY 2022 · today. The 1984 cogen carries 100% of campus baseload generation. BAAQMD permit pressure pending. No fuel-flexibility headroom.
By 2045, BCal will have prevented 552,320 metric tons CO2e from SJSU's central plant — equivalent to taking 120,000 passenger vehicles off California roads for a year, at EPA's 4.6 MT/vehicle-yr factor.
Annual NOx emissions · cogen
32.3 → 0
tons/yr · CARB 2022 · BAAQMD reportable

MCFC fuel cells emit <0.01 lb/MWh NOx — a 99.97% reduction. This eliminates BAAQMD Reg 9-9 BACT exposure entirely. Also eliminates 0.12 t/yr SOx, 22.08 t/yr CO, and 2.63 t/yr PM. The air-quality CEQA findings shift from significant-and-unavoidable to net beneficial.

13 — Data Room

Eight items. Tighter projections.

Our current numbers carry a ±15% confidence band. Each data item SJSU shares (via CPRA or NDA) narrows the band. The model is fully transparent — toggle items below.

Data room progress
0/8
Current accuracy band: ±15%
All public-source — no SJSU data confirmed yet. Site walk + initial data hand-off tightens to ±10%.
14 — Receipts

Every number has a receipt.

No estimate is presented without a source. Before we sent you a single number, we read SJSU's own planning documents end-to-end, parsed the current PG&E tariff, pulled your STARS submission, queried the CEC plant database, and traced the §6417 Direct Pay rule changes through Treasury final regs and OBBBA. The depth below is why our ±15% band is defensible — and why we can tighten to ±5% the moment CPRA returns.

PRIMARY SOURCE
SJSU CMP Draft EIR · 537 pages read
Parsed end-to-end. Quoted page 96 + 261 verbatim on Phase 2 central plant replacement. Cross-referenced Utilities chapter (3.16) and Energy chapter (3.5). Caught the steam-to-hot-water transition flagged in the master plan.
Ascent · SJSU CMP Draft EIR · January 2025 · 24 MB PDF
PRIMARY SOURCE
SJSU STARS 2024-01-19 · OP-5 + OP-1 pulled
Behind the AASHE Gold-rating login. Pulled CY2022 PG&E import 21.27 GWh, on-site solar 2.12 GWh, cogen fuel 482,110 MMBtu, Scope 1 27,616 MTCO2e, NOx 32.3 t/yr. Third-party verified by Locus Technologies (CARB).
SJSU STARS 2024 · Gold rating · score 71.99 · valid Apr 24, 2027
PRIMARY SOURCE
PG&E Schedule SB · current tariff parsed
21-page binary PDF — extracted Reservation Charge per voltage tier. Found SJSU is on Markham 115 kV substation (transmission-voltage tier, $2.08/kW-month), not the $16.29/kW-month primary tier most developers default to. That alone is a $50k/yr correction.
PG&E Electric Schedule SB · Advice 7846-E · eff Mar 1, 2026
PRIMARY SOURCE
CEC QFER Plant G0087 · output records
Queried the California Energy Commission's Quarterly Fuel and Energy Report database directly. Pulled annual generation 34.8 GWh, annual fuel 546,300 MMBtu, plus quarterly seasonality (winter-heavy: Nov 2025–Feb 2026 = 7.4 GWh). Cross-referenced with EIA-860 Plant 10548 for nameplate.
CEC QFER · plant G0087 · EIA-860 Plant 10548
REGULATORY
OBBBA July 2025 · §48E + §6417 traced
Read the Senate parliamentarian ruling that preserved §6417 Direct Pay through reconciliation. Confirmed OBBBA explicitly added fuel cells to §48E at 30% with no prevailing-wage requirement. Mapped the construction-start cliff: 100% through Dec 31, 2033 · 75% in 2034 · 50% in 2035 · 0% in 2036.
Sidley Austin · Kirkland · Pierce Atwood OBBBA briefs (Jul 2025)
REGULATORY
Treasury §6417 final regs · March 2024
Read the elective-payment final rules issued March 11, 2024. Confirmed state instrumentality eligibility for SJSU. Traced the pre-filing registration requirement, the chaining clarifications, and the depreciable-basis qualifying-cost rules.
Treasury final regs §1.6417-1 through 1.6417-6 · IRS Notice 2024-23
POLICY
CSU Sustainability Policy · March 2022 BoT
Pulled the verbatim resolution. Catalogued the seven measurable targets: 2045 carbon neutrality, 2040 80%-below-1990, 2035 NG asset prohibition, 60% renewable electricity by 2030, on-site generation + battery 32→80 MW systemwide by 2030. Mapped each to our Phase 1/2/3 milestones.
CalState.edu · CSU Path to Carbon Neutrality · BoT March 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE
Markham 115 kV substation · SJSU-owned since 2002
Found in EIR §3.16 (Utilities) page 433. Confirms SJSU operates its own substation purchased from PG&E, putting the campus on transmission-voltage tier for both Schedule B-20 and Schedule SB. Material to standby reservation cost and interconnect design.
SJSU CMP Draft EIR · §3.16 · p.433
DERIVED
Supply-mix reconciliation · CY2022 vs SJSU-stated
SJSU's STARS narrative says cogen supplies 80% of campus electric. But CY2022 actual data shows ~57% cogen / 39% grid / 4% PV — campus growth has outpaced cogen output. Flagged the gap so we model Phase 1 against real consumption, not the historical narrative.
STARS OP-5 · cross-checked with CEC QFER
DERIVED
Will-confirmed $0.25/kWh chargeback ≠ SJSU FY17/18 published $0.169/kWh
Read SJSU FDO's published utility rates page (FY17/18: electricity $0.169/kWh, steam $1.37/therm). Bridged the gap to your verbal $0.25/kWh today — implying ~5% annual escalation over the period. Validates the 3%/yr cogen-cost-escalation assumption in our 20-year model.
SJSU FDO Energy & Utilities · FY17/18 published rates · vs verbal CY2026
PRECEDENT
Peer university MCFC references · UCSD 2.8 MW & CSU San Marcos 800 kW
UCSD DFC3000 commissioned 2011 (decommissioned 2020). CSU San Marcos 800 kW (2015–16). CBS Studio Center 1.2 MW (Dec 2013). Public deployments mapped to confirm precedent for MCFC-on-CSU-campus. Selected EPC partner identity disclosed under NDA.
UCSD Energy Storage Center · CARB DG registry · public utility filings
PEOPLE
SJSU FD&O team mapped
William Watson · Senior Energy & Utilities Analyst (you). Maria O'Callaghan-Cassidy · Senior AVP FD&O. Howard Depew · Senior Director (transitioning out; replacement recruited). Debbie Andres · Utilities & Sustainability Analyst (STARS responsible party). We know who signs what.
SJSU FD&O leadership · STARS submission · public records
537 pages of SJSU planning docs read
4 primary databases queried (CEC · EIA · STARS · CARB)
3 Treasury / OBBBA briefs traced for §6417 + §48E
21-page binary PG&E tariff parsed for SB rate
0 numbers in this term sheet without a citation
15 — Procurement Structure

Two paths. One recommended.

SJSU keeps optionality. Path O captures the §6417 cash. Path P preserves it as a procurement fallback if balance-sheet posture argues for ESA.

Path P · ESA / PPA

Third-party owns. SJSU buys energy.

  • Via CSU Master Enabling Agreement (MEA) procurement path
  • Zero SJSU capex · zero balance-sheet impact
  • 20-yr energy services agreement · fixed $/kWh with escalator
  • Third party captures §48E ITC — value priced into ESA rate
  • BCal acts as developer-orchestrator under MEA framework
  • Operational fallback if BoT favors off-balance-sheet posture
16 — Roadmap Recap

Three phases. Twenty years.

Phase 1
2029

2.5 MW MCFC + 1 MW / 4 MWh BESS

2× 1.25 MW modules + LFP storage. Steam tie-in to existing HRSG header. Markham 115 kV interconnect.

Displaces ~93% of CY2022 PG&E imports

19.71 GWh/yr BOL. Cogen continues to provide steam. ~8,600 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1 reduction.

Phase 2
2031–32

+2.5 MW MCFC (total 5 MW)

Doubles fuel-cell capacity. Aligns with SJSU Campus Master Plan Phase 2 central plant replacement per EIR p.96. Steam-to-hot-water conversion supported.

Cogen ramped down

Cumulative ~15,000 MTCO2e/yr Scope 1 reduction. Cogen kept on warm-standby for resilience until Phase 3.

Phase 3
~2034

Cogen retired · construction-start before 12/31/33

Captures final tranche of §48E credit before degradation begins. Decommissioning under EPC scope. Site footprint freed for campus use.

27,616 MTCO2e/yr eliminated · 32.3 t/yr NOx eliminated

Central plant fully transitioned. CSU 2035 NG prohibition compliance achieved. RNG/H2 fuel-flex roadmap operational.

17 — Next Steps

Four steps. Eight weeks.

Each step is a deliverable, not a meeting. Step 4 (LOI) puts SJSU in position to capture the full §48E credit window with maximum schedule slack.

1

Site walk + tie-in survey

2 hours on campus. Cogen room, HRSG header, Markham yard, proposed MCFC pad. Tie-in feasibility memo within 5 business days.

Book site walk
2

24-mo utility data via CPRA or NDA

Eight items in the data room above. Tightens accuracy band from ±15% to ±5%. Confirms cogen heat-rate, chargeback rate, interconnect path.

See data room
3

Governance path + LOI

BCal drafts LOI for SJSU FDO review. CSU Chancellor's Office §6417 eligibility memo + bond counsel concurrence. BoT briefing material.

Request LOI template
4

Mutual NDA execution

Unlocks: MCFC OEM identity, EPC partner identity, vendor proposals, peer UC/CSU references with operational data, LTSA template.

Download NDA
18 — Documents

Two clicks to open the room.

Mutual NDA unlocks vendor identity, peer-deployment data, and the LTSA template. LOI puts SJSU into the §48E construction-start window.

Mutual NDA template

Standard mutual non-disclosure, two-year tail. Covers vendor identities, supplier relationships, EPC partner introductions, peer-customer operational data, and LTSA pricing comparables.

Download NDA template (PDF)

LOI request

Letter of Intent within 5 business days of site walk. Includes preliminary economics, governance approval pathway, BCal developer-fee structure, capital-plan timing, and §6417 Direct Pay flow.

Request LOI
Direct line · founder

Book a 2-hour site walk with Bharath.

On-campus. Cogen room. HRSG header. Markham yard. Proposed MCFC pad. Tie-in feasibility memo within 5 business days of the walk.

2 hours on campus No prep deck required Will and team welcome
2 hr · on campus Book site walk Or email info@bcalenergy.com
Limitation of liability & disclaimer

This page presents a preliminary term sheet based on publicly-available data, customer-confirmed verbal statements, and vendor budgetary proposals disclosed under NDA. BCal does not provide tax advice. SJSU should consult its tax counsel and the CSU Chancellor's Office regarding §6417 Direct Pay and §48E ITC eligibility. Projections are subject to change pending firm vendor quotes, site walk findings, CPRA-confirmed utility data, and BOT approval. Vendor identities, supplier relationships, and EPC partner introductions disclosed under executed mutual NDA. Contact info@bcalenergy.com to initiate.